Study of Normal Egyptian cervical Spinal Canal Using Different Radiological Modalit

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Anatomy & Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, El-Minia University.

2 Department of Anatomy and embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University

3 Department of Human anatomy & Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University.

4 Department of Human anatomy & Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University.

Abstract

Introduction: Decline in the size of Spinal canal would increase chance of compression of important structures and might lead to many symptoms including neck pain, and radiculopathy. Diagnosis of Spinal stenosis based on clinical findings along with the radiological assessing of the canal size measuring antero-posterior diameter and cross-sectional area which are different for each population.
Many factors suggested affecting the spinal canal diameters such as race, sex, height and age which is still a controversial factor.
Aim of the work:  The present study carried out to provide normal values of the cervical spinal canal dimensions in male Egyptian population and to evaluate the effect of aging.
Subjects and methods: MRI of 24 and CT of 32 male Egyptian subjects in different ages from 20 to 70 years. The population divided into three age groups (20-39 years, 40-59 years and 60 years and older). For each age group; Mid-sagittal antro-posterior diameter and Cross sectional area was measured from C2-C7.
Results:Mean values of the cervical canal diameters found to be widely variable fromC2 to C7, and normal diameters defined as antero-posterior (APD) ranged (from 9.60to20mm), and (from 11.2to19.5mm) in CT and MRI respectively. Mid-sagittal antero-posterior canal diameter and Cross sectional area, decreased steadily with age at all levels.
Conclusion: Mean values for the cervical canal diameters decreased steadily at all levels with increase in age. 

Keywords


1-   Abd-Alrahem, A. H., Hasan, H. A. (2016):  Evaluation of Canal Diameter by MRI in Sudanese Population, American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), 22(1), 176-183.
2-   Abuelnor, M. (2016): Morphometric study of the lumbar spinal canal and lumbar stenosis in Sudanese, Research gate; 4(12C):4372-4377. 
3-   AL-Anazi, A.  R., Nasser, M., Moghazy, K., Hosam, A.-J., & Osama, E.-H. (2007): Radiographic measurement of lumbar spinal canal size and canal/body ratio in normal adult Saudis. Neurosurgery Quarterly, 17(1), 19-22.
4-   Alam, M. M., Waqas, M., Shallwani, H., & Javed, G. (2014): Lumbar morphometry: a study of lumbar vertebrae from a Pakistani population using computed tomography scans,Asian spine journal; 8(4):421-426.
5-   Alvarez, J., & Hardy, J. R. (1998): Lumbar spine stenosis: a common cause of back and leg pain, American family physician; 57(8): 1825-1834, 1839-1840.
6-   Aly, T., & Amin, O. (2013): Geometrical dimensions and morphological study of the lumbar spinal canal in the normal Egyptian population, Orthopedics; 36(2):e229-e234.
7-   Chatha, D. S., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2011): MRI criteria of developmental lumbar spinal stenosis revisited, Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases; 69(4): 303-307.
8-   Chaudhary, S., Sarvesh, Pal Singh Batra, A., Gupta, R., & Swami, S. (2015): A radiographic study of interpedicular distance of the lumbar vertebrae measured in plain antero-posterior radiographs, Int. J. of Adv. Res; 3 (8). 33-36
9-   Elhassan, Y. A. M., Ali, Q. M., & Ahmed, A. O. (2014): Sagittal diameter of the lumbosacral spinal canal in normal (asymptomatic) adult Sudanese population 2014. Sudan Medical Monitor, 9(4), 153-158.
10-    Fetouh, F. A. (2015): age and gender related changes in midsagittal dimensions of the lumbar spine in normal egyptians: mri study. International journal of current research and review (ijcrr), 7(2), 21-40.
11-    Gour, K., Shrivastava, S., & Thakare, A. (2011): Size of cervical vertebral canal-measurements in lateral cervical radiographs and dried bones. Int J Biol Med Res, 2(3), 778-780.
12-    John K Hsiang, (2016): Spinal stenosis, Medscape Website
13-    Kathole, M., Joshi, R., Herekar, N., & Jadhav, S. (2012): Dimensions of cervical spinal canal and vertebrae and their relevance in clinical practice. Int J Recent Trends Sci Tech, 3, 54-58.
14-    Kim, K. H., Park, J. Y., Kuh, S. U., Chin, D. K., Kim, K. S., & Cho, Y. E. (2013): Changes in spinal canal diameter and vertebral body height with age, Yonsei medical journal; 54(6): 1498-1504.
15-    Lee, M. J., Cassinelli, E. H., & Riew, K. D. (2007): Prevalence of cervical spine stenosis, Anatomic study in cadavers, J Bone Joint Surg Am; 89(2): 376-380. 
16-    Matveeva, N., Janevski, P., Nakeva, N., Zhivadinovik, J., & Dodevski, A. (2013): Morphometric analysis of the cervical spinal canal on MRI, Prilozi; 34(2): 97-103.
17-    Moore, K. L., Dalley, A. F., & Agur, A. M. (2013): Clinically oriented anatomy, Third ED, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 4:439-507.
18-    Orha, A. T., Dalcik, C., & Ilbay, K. (2016): Evaluation of Anthropometric Characteristics Due to Sex and Age Variables of Lumbar Vertebra and Spinal Canal, The Anthropologist; 24(2): 617-622.
19-    Santiago, F., Milena, G., Herrera, R., Romero, P., & Plazas, P. (2001): Morphometry of the lower lumbar vertebrae in patients with and without low back pain, European Spine Journal; 10(3): 228-233.
20-    Tacar, O., Demırant, A., Nas, K., & AltindaÄŸ, O. (2003): Morphology of the lumbar spinal canal in normal adult Turks, Yonsei medical journal; 44(4): 679-685.
21-    Ulbrich, E. J., Schraner, C., Boesch, C., Hodler, J., Busato, A., Anderson, S. E., Sturzenegger, M. (2014): Normative MR cervical spinal canal dimensions, Radiology; 271(1):172-182.
22-    Zhang, L., Chen, H. B., Wang, Y., Zhang, L. Y., Liu, J. C., & Wang, Z. G. (2012): Cervical spinal canal narrowing and cervical neurological injuries, Chin J Traumatol; 15(1): 36-41.