Updates of Pulmonary Embolism

Elsayed, Mohamed

doi:10.21608/smj.2018.35256

Updates of Pulmonary Embolism

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Mohamed Elsayed

Department of Internal Medicine. faculty of medicine.sohag University

10.21608/smj.2018.35256

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cause of cardiovascular death worldwide, behind myocardial infarction and stroke. Due to pulmonary bed obstruction, PE can result in acute right ventricular (RV) failure which is a life-threatening condition. Because most patients ultimately die within the first hours of presentation, early diagnosis is very important (1). Mortality due to pulmonary embolism varies greatly, depending on various factors including age, comorbid conditions, and stability on presentation. Patients with low-risk PE have a 1-year survival rate over 95%. In contrast, patients presenting with high risk PE and hemodynamic instability have an approximately 40% mortality rate within 90-days. In this review, we will discuss the basic pathophysiology of PE, risk factors for developing PE, and standard diagnostic testing modalities. We will also cover risk stratification of patients presenting with PE and the implications for treatment and disposition. While no exact epidemiological data are available, the incidence of PE is estimated to be approximately 60 to 70 per 100,000, and that of venous thrombosis approximately 124 per 100,000 of the general population (2). The European guidelines for the diagnosis and management of PE report annual incidence rates of venous thrombosis and PE of approximately 0.5 to 1.0 per 1000 inhabitants (3). However, the actual figures are likely to be substantially higher because silent PE can develop in up to 40% to 50% of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (3)

References

1. Bĕlohlávek J, Dytrych V, Linhart A. Pulmonary embolism, part I: Epidemiology, risk factors and risk stratification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism. Experimental & Clinical Cardiology. 2013;18(2):129-38.

2. Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2000;83(5):657-60.

3. Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S, Agnelli G, Galie N, Pruszczyk P, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2008;29(18):2276-315.

4. Riedel M. Acute pulmonary embolism 1: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and diagnosis. Heart. 2001;85(2):229-40.

5. Meyer G, Vieillard-Baron A, Planquette B. Recent advances in the management of pulmonary embolism: focus on the critically ill patients. Annals of Intensive Care. 2016;6:19.

6. Aujesky D, Roy PM, Le Manach CP, Verschuren F, Meyer G, Obrosky DS, et al. Validation of a model to predict adverse outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(4):476-81.

7. Poort SR, Rosendaal FR, Reitsma PH, Bertina RM. A common genetic variation in the 3'-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene is associated with elevated plasma prothrombin levels and an increase in venous thrombosis. Blood. 1996;88(10):3698-703.

8. Ginsburg KS, Liang MH, Newcomer L, Goldhaber SZ, Schur PH, Hennekens CH, et al. Anticardiolipin antibodies and the risk for ischemic stroke and venous thrombosis. Annals of internal medicine. 1992;117(12):997-1002.

9. Goldhaber SZ, Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, et al. A prospective study of risk factors for pulmonary embolism in women. Jama. 1997;277(8):642-5.

10. Sanchez O, Trinquart L, Caille V, Couturaud F, Pacouret G, Meneveau N, et al. Prognostic factors for pulmonary embolism: the prep study, a prospective multicenter cohort study. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2010;181(2):168-73.

11.Kabrhel C, Okechukwu I. Factors associated with clinical deterioration shortly after PE. 2014;69(9):835-42.

12. Carrier M, Righini M, Djurabi RK, Huisman MV, Perrier A, Wells PS, et al. VIDAS D-dimer in combination with clinical pre-test probability to rule out pulmonary embolism. A systematic review of management outcome studies. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2009;101(5):886-92.

13. Ghignone M, Girling L, Prewitt RM. Volume expansion versus norepinephrine in treatment of a low cardiac output complicating an acute increase in right ventricular afterload in dogs. Anesthesiology. 1984;60(2):132-5.

14. Mercat A, Diehl JL, Meyer G, Teboul JL, Sors H. Hemodynamic effects of fluid loading in acute massive pulmonary embolism. Critical care medicine. 1999;27(3):540-4.

15. Konstantinides S, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galie N, et al. Downloaded from Schindler TH, Svitil P, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Zamorano JL, Zompatori M. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:3033-69.